Business Law And Litigation Boutique In Toronto And Hamilton

866-293-9010

O’Connor Richardson Professional Corporation Legal Blog

Concealed defects cost Ontario seller $129,000 after negligent misrepresentation finding

by | Jun 18, 2026 |

The principle of buyer beware offers some protection to real estate vendors, but it is not an absolute defence to a latent defect claim. If a seller deceives or misleads a buyer about the state of the property, they run the risk of being held liable.

An increasing number of latent-defect plaintiffs are adding claims for mental stress and inconvenience. These claims are highly fact-specific, and judges have taken differing positions on their availability in breach-of-contract actions.

Ontario Court of Appeal enforces oral agreement for sale of land

by | Feb 2, 2026 | , ,

Although Ontario’s Statute of Frauds generally bars the enforcement of an oral agreement for the purchase of land, Canadian law recognizes an exception to the rule: the equitable doctrine of part performance.

You’ll need more than a simple handshake to prove the existence of an oral agreement, but convincing a judge to apply the doctrine of part performance is possible in the right circumstances, as the recent Court of Appeal decision in 2730453 Ontario Inc. v. 2380673 Ontario Inc. demonstrates.

Appeal Court upholds partial summary judgment in real estate fraud case

by | Oct 1, 2025 | , ,

The summary judgment rule in Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure grants judges enhanced fact-finding powers, allowing them to decide cases finally without the need for a full trial. Even partial summary judgment — where a judge decides certain key issues based on a limited record — can move parties a long way towards a final resolution, by narrowing the issues in dispute and encouraging the parties to settle those that remain

Judge upholds arbitrator’s decision, keeps constructive trust debate going

by | Aug 1, 2025 |

The Supreme Court may revisit constructive trusts to resolve the outstanding question of whether the remedy is precluded beyond cases of unjust enrichment or wrongful acts. But in the meantime, the takeaway for litigants is that the constructive trusts may be imposed based on good conscience alone.

The fact that so many commercial matters end up being settled behind closed doors in arbitration helps explain the relative lack of public decisions on issues like this one. But it’s not just the privacy of the process that attracts parties to alternative dispute resolution, and this case will also be encouraging for reinforcing the finality of arbitral decisions.

Court of Appeal upholds court-ordered sale under Partition Act

by | Jun 2, 2025 |

When co-owners’ interests diverge, Ontario’s Partition Act provides an effective mechanism for the division and sale of a property, as the Court of Appeal recently demonstrated when it upheld a motion judge’s order for the sale of a jointly owned commercial propertyin Nutrition Guidance Services Inc. v. Schwartz. When co-owners can no longer work together, courts will not force them to remain as co-owners and will order a sale under the Partition Act.

Court of Appeal sends fraudulent conveyance and oppression claims for fresh trial

by | Jan 13, 2025 |

Transferring assets in the lead-up to an insolvency could expose debtors to two similar, but distinct claims from their creditors these being claims for oppression and fraudulent conveyance.
Disposing of assets on the eve of insolvency is likely to be met with a claim for oppression, fraudulent conveyance or both, especially if the transfers were made in the face of a legal claim from one of your creditors.
The test for fraudulent conveyance is potentially an easier one for creditors to meet than the one for oppression.

$350K deposit returned to purchaser who terminated commercial property deal

by | Nov 4, 2024 | , ,

Any buyer who terminates a binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) should expect the vendor to move for the forfeiture of their deposit immediately. In a depressed market, an innocent seller may even be entitled to further damages to make up the difference between the sale price agreed in the failed deal and any lower bid they ultimately accept.

However, purchasers who successfully shift the blame for the collapsed deal to the vendor may be able to recover their deposit, even if they were the ones to call it off.